<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>The blog of a dangerous madman</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/</link><atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/feed/rss2/comments/"/><description>Here is the place where I post random things that have come and shown themselves.  Please comment as long as it isn't spam or selling porn.&#13;
&#13;
Please ignore the web url.  I am not Scottish, but some form of insanity possessed me when I created this thing and the url is unchangeable.&#13;
&#13;
Enjoy.</description><language>en-UK</language><generator>MokoFeed</generator><ttl>10</ttl><item><title>In response to:Oh yes, I shall hedge my bets again. ;)</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/07/01/title-4390426/#c7179823</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2008-07-01:/2008/07/01/title-4390426/#c7179823</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:36:44 +0200</pubDate><description>Interesting. Looks promising, but we will see.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/07/01/title-4390426/#c7179823</comments></item><item><title>In response to:A new bloginning</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c7129024</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2008-06-25:/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c7129024</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:46:01 +0200</pubDate><description>Ah well, that only means the comments will be different. :P</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c7129024</comments></item><item><title>In response to:A new bloginning</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c6835702</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2008-05-19:/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c6835702</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:54:31 +0200</pubDate><description>Don't be that stupid, I'm not syncing up comments all the god damn time!!!</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/05/10/a-new-bloginning-4156591/#c6835702</comments></item><item><title>In response to:Some more random</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6654324</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2008-04-25:/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6654324</guid><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:03:13 +0200</pubDate><description>Ah, you have to take out the generators protecting them.  Find the road tunnel, it allows you to outflank their forces.  Don't go across the bridge where the cyborgs attack, the area beyond is filled with enemy units and you'll be hard pressed to get enough units through to defeat them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To do this, you must repair the bridge (where three of them meet).  A single engineer gets dropped on the only side with the hut to repair it.  You must get him there, then move your forces across without bothering the cyborgs.  The tunnel is just behind there, you should be able to see it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I hope that helps. :)</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6654324</comments></item><item><title>In response to:Some more random</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6582266</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2008-04-16:/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6582266</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:52:31 +0200</pubDate><description>I've recently played this game again after about a year of completing it first time, I'm bloody stuck on the vegas dams...I can't for the life of me remember how I proceeded....</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2008/04/16/some-more-random-4053708/#c6582266</comments></item><item><title>In response to:Well this sucks</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/12/02/well_this_sucks~3384011/#c5369762</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-12-02:/2007/12/02/well_this_sucks~3384011/#c5369762</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:40:48 +0100</pubDate><description>Holy hell, I just found the list, too many, I say!</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/12/02/well_this_sucks~3384011/#c5369762</comments></item><item><title>In response to:OMG, another entry!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5289997</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-11-23:/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5289997</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:45:43 +0100</pubDate><description>You could at least post constructive entries. ¬¬</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5289997</comments></item><item><title>In response to:OMG, another entry!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5282337</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-11-22:/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5282337</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:00:08 +0100</pubDate><description>OMG! A post!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nothing really to say, I'm feeling lazy. I just must have the spam!</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/11/22/omg_another_entry~3337221/#c5282337</comments></item><item><title>In response to:AS results!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/08/18/as_results~2828074/#c4381948</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-08-18:/2007/08/18/as_results~2828074/#c4381948</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:14:27 +0200</pubDate><description>Gratz</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/08/18/as_results~2828074/#c4381948</comments></item><item><title>In response to:BROADBAND!!!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171957</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-31:/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171957</guid><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:23:15 +0200</pubDate><description>No problem...</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171957</comments></item><item><title>In response to:BROADBAND!!!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171430</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-31:/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171430</guid><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:01:45 +0200</pubDate><description>Done. Thanks for telling me. ;)</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3171430</comments></item><item><title>In response to:BROADBAND!!!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165078</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-30:/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165078</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:26:03 +0200</pubDate><description>Oh, and your BMS link is bust, you missed the http://.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Couldn't see an edit button, sorry.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165078</comments></item><item><title>In response to:BROADBAND!!!</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165075</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-30:/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165075</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:24:31 +0200</pubDate><description>Hmmm... maybe I should change your name to Master Bob, seeing as that is what you use mostly now.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/27/broadband~1983565/#c3165075</comments></item><item><title>In response to:A most distressing worry</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3162911</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-30:/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3162911</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:56:05 +0200</pubDate><description>Hmm, I didn't read anything about that happening, just he was banned wrongly by the VAC system messing up I guess.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3162911</comments></item><item><title>In response to:A most distressing worry</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3160546</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-30:/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3160546</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:35:54 +0200</pubDate><description>I don't think VAC is a bad system either.  However, what I do not like is the fact that some 12 year old who gets pwned can then record a demo video of a pro player doing really well, then send that video to Valve claiming that pro player is a cheater, getting that player banned.  That's just wrong.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3160546</comments></item><item><title>In response to:A most distressing worry</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3154627</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2007-03-29:/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3154627</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:52:40 +0200</pubDate><description>Hmm, technically VAC2 (the current system) is generally 100% accurate, in that it only detect specific hacks (the reason some people can still hack - new ones not added yet), unlike VAC1 which detected hack behaviour. However, I think sometimes something screws up and people are wrongly banned, which Valve see and revert soon after.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don't think VAC is a bad system, just like everything else, it can have problems. The key thing to note is that they are pretty much always reverted by Valve.</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2007/03/29/a_most_distressing_worry~1997720/#c3154627</comments></item><item><title>In response to:Networking</title><link>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2005/07/28/networking/#c66509</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk,2005-07-28:/2005/07/28/networking/#c66509</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:55:11 +0200</pubDate><description>May I suggest you buy an abacus and play with that instead.  Networking them is simple, just a bit of string and your ready to go :-)</description><comments>http://sinisterscotsman.blog.co.uk/2005/07/28/networking/#c66509</comments></item></channel></rss>
